1 page

*Option #1:** Analysis and Summary of First Research Source* Your role and task: You’ve been appointed to research a proposal for a new idea on a college campus, based on the Portfolio Project topic you've selected. The proposal will be presented to senior college administrators. Your task is to make suggestions, based on research, for a proposal supporting the campaign topic. Step 1 - You will go to the CSU-Global Library (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. <http://csuglobal.libguides.com/apacitations> and find a recent article (*no more than 5 years old*) to support the Portfolio Project topic you've selected. Step 2 - You will format a full APA citation for this source. For help with APA citation, use the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. <http://csuglobal.libguides.com/apacitations>and other resources found through the Library. Step 3 – Read and think about your article. If you want to, print the PDF or HTML version of your article from the library, take notes as you read, highlight key points, and make marginal comments, evaluating and making judgments about passages. Step 4 – Now write a paragraph analyzing how this source will specifically support your ideas. Discuss its strengths and its weaknesses for the ideas noted in the article. *NOTE:* You will use this article again in the course, so remember to keep a copy. Criteria and Format - This assignment should be 200 words in length or about 6 – 10 sentences. - Include a double-spaced cover page with three lines centered halfway down the page stating First Research Source, Your first and last name, and the date. - Double-space the one to two paragraphs. - This evaluation of your first source should be mostly in your own words, but you may include one short, partial quotation or paraphrase with a proper APA in text citation if you wish (not required). On a separate page titled Reference*,* create the full citation of your first source in proper format according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. <http://csuglobal.libguides.com/apacitations>, including the hanging indent. COM300 CT Mod 2 COM300 CT Mod 2 CriteriaRatingsPts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements 15.0 to >12.0 pts Meets Expectation Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 12.0 to >9.0 pts Approaches Expectation Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 9.0 to >6.0 pts Below Expectation Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 6.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 15.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent 20.0 to >16.0 pts Meets Expectation Source meets required criteria and is well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. 16.0 to >12.0 pts Approaches Expectation Source meets required criteria but is less‐than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. 12.0 to >8.0 pts Below Expectation Source meets required criteria and is poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. 8.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Source selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient. 20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis 20.0 to >16.0 pts Meets Expectation Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the search results. 16.0 to >12.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation of the search results. 12.0 to >8.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation of the search results. 8.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the search results. 20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCollege-level Proficiency in Organization, Grammar, and Style. 10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format, as outlined in the assignment; few errors in grammar and spelling. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Project is fairly well organized and written and in proper format, as outlined in the assignment; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Project is poorly organized and does not follow proper paper format; numerous errors in grammar and spelling. 4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Project is not well organized or written, and is not in proper paper format; poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProper Use of APA Style. 15.0 to >12.0 pts Meets Expectation Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with no more than one significant error. 12.0 to >9.0 pts Approaches Expectation No more than two to three significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements. 9.0 to >6.0 pts Below Expectation Four to five significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements. 6.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence More than five significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements. 15.0 pts Total Points: 80.0 Previous <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/9876/modules/items/480519>Next <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/9876/modules/items/480521>