order S003 4 page due 1330hrs

ONLINE OBSESSIONS: Answer any two (2) of the following questions. Answers to each question should be in the range of *500-700* words, or the equivalent of two-three typed, 12 point font, double-spaced pages, and include *at least two* references other than those in the reading assignments. Please note that your references should begin on a new page separate from your answer to the question. 1. What are the effects of Nomophobia? Does this vary from country to country? Age group to age group? Socio-economic status? Occupation? [MO4.4] 2. Describe the central role of social media in the lives of students. Is it easy or hard to reduce students’ use of these types of online social media forms? [MO4.1] 3. Describe how Internet addiction can shatter families, relationships and careers in a comparison of at least two different countries. [MO4.2, 4.3] 4. Video games provide people with things they lack in real life. They provide a steady supply of stimulation to satisfy our needs. And yet, this is all an illusion. Explain how people can become so caught up that they lose themselves in the process. [MO4.1] READING MATERIAL: The following articles can be accessed through ProQuest or EBSCOhost via the myEdison portal or through the New Jersey State Library databases. Log into the myEdison portal and go to My Resources > Educational. There you will find the links to the ProQuest and EBSCOhost databases. The New Jersey State Library databases can be found at http://www.njstatelib.org/. Students must first sign up for a free card in order to access the online journal articles. Register for your card at https://www.njstatelib.org/research_library/get_a_library_card/state_employee_and_tesu_students/ . The specific database for each article is listed in parenthesis. - Dixit et al (2010). A study to evaluate mobile phone dependence among students of a medical college associated hospital of central India. (ProQuest) - Chakraborty, K, Basu, D, & Kumar, KG V. (2010). Internet addiction: Consensus, controversies, and the way ahead. (ProQuest) - Huang, H. & Leung, L. (2009). Instant messaging addiction among teenagers in china: shyness, alienation, and academic performance decrement. (EBSCOhost Academic Search Premiere) - Nithya et al (2012). Facebook and other social media usage (India). (EBSCOhost Academic Search Complete through the New Jersey State Library) - Chung, N. (2011). Korean adolescent girls’ addictive use of mobile phones to maintain interpersonal solidarity. (EBSCOhost Academic Search Premiere) RUBRIC: Grading criteria Question 1 You thoroughly answer the question and demonstrate a sophisticated, in-depth understanding of the topic(s) through a well-reasoned and thoughtful response; your answer is substantive, with relevant references and examples and a clear connection to the readings where necessary. You satisfactorily answer the question and demonstrate a basic understanding of the topic(s); your answer is generally correct but lacks full development and a clear connection to the readings where necessary. You incompletely answer the question and demonstrate a limited understanding of the topic(s); your answer lacks substantive information and connection to the readings where necessary. You insufficiently answer the question and demonstrate an inadequate understanding of the topic(s); your answer is off-topic, incorrect, or irrelevant to the readings. null Question 2 You thoroughly answer the question and demonstrate a sophisticated, in-depth understanding of the topic(s) through a well-reasoned and thoughtful response; your answer is substantive, with relevant references and examples and a clear connection to the readings where necessary. You satisfactorily answer the question and demonstrate a basic understanding of the topic(s); your answer is generally correct but lacks full development and a clear connection to the readings where necessary. You incompletely answer the question and demonstrate a limited understanding of the topic(s); your answer lacks substantive information and connection to the readings where necessary. You insufficiently answer the question and demonstrate an inadequate understanding of the topic(s); your answer is off-topic, incorrect, or irrelevant to the readings. null Overall organization You lucidly organize material into well-formed paragraphs and arrange ideas logically to support the purpose of the paper; writing is fluid with an explicit focus and sensible structure. You logically organize material into well-formed paragraphs; writing has focus and structure. You loosely organize material and provide limited supporting detail; writing is somewhat disjointed and disorganized. You incoherently organize material, often impairing the reader's ability to comprehend it; significant details are missing or irrelevant; writing is completely disjointed and lacks correct form and structure. null Overall use of evidence You support points and subpoints with abundant clarifying detail, include relevant and clearly attributed sources as necessary, and effectively link ideas. You support most points and subpoints with sufficient detail, attribute sources as necessary, and link ideas. You support points and subpoints with limited detail and improperly link ideas. You inadequately support points and subpoints with irrelevant detail and do not properly link ideas. null Overall mechanics You write in complete, well-constructed sentences with faultless grammar, word choice, punctuation, and spelling; writing is sharp, coherent, and demonstrates sophisticated clarity. You write in complete sentences with mostly correct grammar, word choice, punctuation, and spelling; minor errors may exist but do not compromise meaning. You write in unclear sentences with significant errors in grammar, word choice, punctuation, and spelling that may compromise meaning. You write in incomplete, incomprehensible sentences filled with serious errors in grammar, word choice, punctuation, or spelling. null