Outline for capstone

Criteria for Detailed Outline Follow the instructions below to develop a detailed outline for your capstone paper. You should also go through the rubric to ensure you are meeting all expectations for the assignment. Reminder: What format is expected for the outline? Please include a properly formatted *title page* with your outline. APA does *not* specify a specific format for the outline. However, you must use a hierarchical structure of numbers and letters (*not* bullet points). You may use single-spacing or double-spacing. All citations should be in proper APA format, but *you do NOT need to include your references* page with this assignment. If a references page is submitted, it will *not* be reviewed. ****No quotations are allowed. Be sure to paraphrase and CITE CITE CITE. We have to cite someone else's ideas, results, conclusions, etc. * *Note: This assignment utilizes Turnitin. It is your responsibility to check your Turnitin report and make any necessary revisions PRIOR to the assignment deadline. * Rubric Detailed Outline Rubric Detailed Outline Rubric CriteriaRatingsPts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome1) Organization & Development 30 to >28.0 pts Excellent Each main argument is well-aligned to the thesis, research to support each main argument clearly belongs as organized (i.e., highly relevant), and idea progression from introduction to conclusion is well-developed and the logic uninterrupted. 28 to >26.0 pts Very Good Each main argument is well-aligned to the thesis, research to support each main argument mostly belongs as organized (i.e., mostly relevant), and idea progression from introduction to conclusion is mostly well-developed and the logic uninterrupted 26 to >24.0 pts Satisfactory Each main argument is mostly aligned to the thesis, research to support each main argument somewhat belongs as organized (i.e., somewhat relevant), and idea progression from introduction to conclusion is somewhat developed, although the logic is interrupted in places 24 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory Main arguments are not aligned to the thesis, the research is not organized, and idea progression from introduction to conclusion is poorly-developed and illogical. 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome2) Focus and Comprehensiveness 30 to >28.0 pts Excellent There are at least 3 main arguments and at least 3 sources for each argument; details for prior research are clearly, accurately, and thoroughly summarized; all information is very appropriate and provides comprehensive support for main arguments. 28 to >26.0 pts Very Good There are at least 3 main arguments and at least 3 sources for each argument; details for prior research are mostly clearly and accurately summarized (slightly vague in part); most information is appropriate, with only minor exception, and provides mostly comprehensive support for main ideas. 26 to >24.0 pts Satisfactory There are less than 3 main arguments OR less than 3 sources for each argument; details for prior research are somewhat clearly and accurately summarized (vague and too brief in parts); some information is appropriate, but some seems tangential to focus, and comprehensive support for main ideas is somewhat lacking. 24 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory There are less than 3 main arguments AND less than 3 sources for each argument; details for prior research are not clearly and accurately summarized (overall vague and too brief); much of the information provided is not appropriate and there are significant gaps in the support for main ideas. 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome3) Feasibility of Executing Research Study Proposed 30 to >28.0 pts Excellent Presents a clear and accurate study proposal that stems from a thorough and insightful rationale. Shows careful thought in terms of study components and their overall integration into a clear and cohesive plan for conducting the study. 28 to >26.0 pts Very Good Presents a mostly clear and accurate study proposal that stems from the rationale. Shows mostly careful thought in terms of study components and their overall integration into a clear and cohesive plan for conducting the study. 26 to >24.0 pts Satisfactory Presents a study proposal, but clarity or accuracy is lacking for some study components and the link between the rationale and the study components is somewhat weak. Overall integration of study components into a clear and cohesive plan for conducting the study has not been achieved. 24 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory Presents a study proposal, but clarity or accuracy is lacking for most study components and the link between the rationale and the study components is exceptionally weak; or some of the study components are missing. Study proposal is completely un-doable as currently written. 30 pts Total Points: 90