REACTION PAPER MODULE 4

Module 4 Reading Reaction Paper Instructions and scoring criteria for this assignment are provided in the *Assessment Details <https://canvas.asu.edu/courses/155409/modules/1742733>* module. Note: This assignment uses *Turnitin*. It is your responsibility to check the report and make any necessary revisions prior to the deadline. See the page *A Note About Turnitin* <https://canvas.asu.edu/courses/155409/pages/a-note-about-turnitin> for more information on how to interpret your report. Rubric Reading Reaction Paper Rubric Reading Reaction Paper Rubric CriteriaRatingsPts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Course Readings (1.1) Information cited from readings provides enough background detail to provide the foundation for an appropriate analysis 3 pts Meets Criteria 2.5 pts Partially Meets Criteria 2 pts Insufficiently Meets Criteria 0 pts Missing 3 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Course Readings (1.2) A minimum of THREE separate course readings are used to develop the reaction, with at least TWO of the readings contained in the current module 2 pts Meets Criteria 1.5 pts Partially Meets Criteria 1 pts Insufficiently Meets Criteria 0 pts Missing 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Course Readings (1.3) ONLY the assigned course readings for the specific module (required or supplementary) are used as the basis of your arguments (para. 1) 1 pts Meets Criteria 0.5 pts Partially Meets Criteria 0 pts Insufficiently Meets Criteria 0 pts Missing 1 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of Analysis (2.1) Critique of author(s)’ main points using evidence to support arguments is thoughtful: Tools of analysis are clearly demonstrated and effectively applied (compare/contrast, evaluate, synthesize, relate, question, criticize, etc.) 5 pts Meets Criteria 4 pts Partially Meets Criteria 3 pts Insufficiently Meets Criteria 0 pts Missing 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of Analysis (2.2) Supporting evidence is highly relevant to the argument(s) being made 2 pts Meets Criteria 1.5 pts Partially Meets Criteria 1 pts Insufficiently Meets Criteria 0 pts Missing 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of Analysis (2.3) Incorporates multiple perspectives to build a robust analysis 2 pts Meets Criteria 1.5 pts Partially Meets Criteria 1 pts Insufficiently Meets Criteria 0 pts Missing 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of Analysis (2.4) Analysis demonstrates insight by going beyond what is in the reading itself and beyond the obvious 1 pts Meets Criteria 0.5 pts Partially Meets Criteria 0 pts Insufficiently Meets Criteria 0 pts Missing 1 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of Personal Perspective (3.1) Demonstrates how the main point(s) from the reading(s) changed their understanding or perspective on a particular issue, concept, theory, or methodological approach in cognitive science 3 pts Meets Criteria 2.5 pts Partially Meets Criteria 2 pts Insufficiently Meets Criteria 0 pts Missing 3 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of Personal Perspective (3.2) Perspective is justified, not merely stated (e.g., rationale provided; kudos if uses cited evidence) 1 pts Meets Criteria 0.5 pts Partially Meets Criteria 0 pts Insufficiently Meets Criteria 0 pts Missing 1 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of Personal Perspective (3.3) Specific, not general or vague (use of specific examples—author bias or weakness, muddy points/questions, prior knowledge connections, insight, etc.) 1 pts Meets Criteria 0.5 pts Partially Meets Criteria 0 pts Insufficiently Meets Criteria 0 pts Missing 1 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of Writing (4.1) Clear and effective writing: free of spelling and grammatical errors, logical organization from start to end 1 pts Meets Criteria 0.5 pts Partially Meets Criteria 0 pts Insufficiently Meets Criteria 0 pts Missing 1 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of Writing (4.2) Paraphrasing is used over direct quotations and effective 1 pts Meets Criteria 0.5 pts Partially Meets Criteria 0 pts Insufficiently Meets Criteria 0 pts Missing 1 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat and APA Style (5.1) Length is between 400 and 600 words; text beyond 620 words is not evaluated 1 pts Meets Criteria 0.5 pts Partially Meets Criteria 0 pts Insufficiently Meets Criteria 0 pts Missing 1 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat and APA Style (5.2) APA formatting rules are correctly applied 1 pts Meets Criteria 0.5 pts Partially Meets Criteria 0 pts Insufficiently Meets Criteria 0 pts Missing 1 pts Total Points: 25 https://youtu.be/RE4ce4mexrU?si=Bf4cJBPTqJC_6RDl <https://youtu.be/RE4ce4mexrU?si=Bf4cJBPTqJC_6RDl> <https://youtu.be/GG1BGreFU_Y> Module 4: Technology & Data (Spring 2019) <https://youtu.be/GG1BGreFU_Y> youtu.be <https://youtu.be/GG1BGreFU_Y> <https://youtu.be/GG1BGreFU_Y> Sent from my iPhone