SS003

Sociology Reading Materials and links Textbook ReadingsRead chapters 6, 11 to 15 in The Modern Gang Reader edited by Maxson, Egley, Miller, & Klein. https://www.iir.com/nygc/ Using a classification schema from the text or one discovered in your current research for Module 1 (include example and citations), apply the classification of gangs to the information gathered in module one to explain and identify local gang types, activities and norms (3-4 pages with appropriate citations) Purpose: To discover the issues and problems in creating classifications for gangs including a definition which delineates what constitutes a gang and differentiates it from other social and sports groups. What is the definition of a team? The text provides an overview of some research into these issues. 1. Read the Text, Chapters 6, 11 to 15. (*You may also use any information from the chapters you read in Module 1.*) 2. Using research studies from the text as a beginning point, going to one of the online resources such as the National Youth Gang Center <http://www.iir.com/nygc/> or local sources, research classification approaches for Gangs. Also check library databases and recommended web links in Module 1. 3. Compare at least three approaches to classify gang data acquired in Module 1. What types of gangs are in evidence using each approach? How do you know that? Does this classification provide any specific insights or information about gangs in the Community? 4. What problems did you encounter in applying that classification to your data? How representative is that of other efforts? 5. Create your report (3-4 pages). Include a brief statement on your process (2-3 paragraphs) and appropriate citations (APA Style <https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/>). Rubric: Assessment Rubric: This is the form that will be used to grade the assignment. Standard Developing (0-12) Accomplished (13-17) Exemplary (18-20) Score Relevance of Results Relevance of the research to this particular assignment is not clear or links to assignments are not clearly identified Little or No evidence of “digging” Only one or two sources Interview questions and responses not identified Research results are relevant to the topic. Indicates breadth of research Findings identified clearly Interview questions and answers included Linkages between data and assignment are clearly stated Sources include interviews and online sources Results are highly relevant provide evidence of a broad search including organizations, academic journals, and educational and commercial sites, clearly stated. Clear evidence of digging References are provided for sources, appropriately cited. Clarity of presentation Process is not clearly delineated; repetition is not possible Report wanders. Key points not identified Data is presented with explanation or interpretation. References not included or inappropriately cited Report lacks organization Report has spelling or grammatical errors Process reporting allows easy replication; results and clearly and concisely stated. Report is organized, data is organized and interpreted indicating trends Terms changed and logic of search is evident. Internet cites include url and examples of data or information Interview data is identified by name, title and date Research findings organized and integrated; appropriately cited Analysis of data and trends are clearly stated; citations are evident and correct Statement of facts are supported by data or relevant examples The Report flows well and is clear and concise Depth of Search Relies on minimal research results. No evidence of deeper exploration Results and process reflect more in-depth exploration of search concepts. Follow up linkages are explicit. Interviews show no follow-up Interviews and internet searches are explored to discover essential data Follow-up questions and answers are evident Total score: Copyright © 2016 by Thomas Edison State University. All rights reserved.