Fatigue

The paper should be a minimum of five (5) pages not including title page/reference pages, and it should address the following: FATIGUE Describe the concept using a scenario, model case summary, vignette, etc. Speak to the significance of the idea either to you personally, professionally, or to health care delivery or health policy. Think about why this concept is essential! Next, address your specific goals in working through the concept analysis and relate it to your area of practice. What are the underlying assumptions for this analysis? Speak to your beliefs concerning the phenomenon before conducting the analysis if your premises are also reflected in the literature reference the sources. Provide at least two definitions of the concept found in the literature. Compare (differences and similarities) the definitions either as you present them or provide a summary. If there are related concepts in the literature, describe/ define them in this section of the paper. Describe a case and provide a summary of it that exemplifies the defining criteria of the model or exemplar case. When presenting the model case, underline or bold the defining characteristics. Grading Rubric for Theory Concept Paper Grading Rubric for Theory Concept Paper Criteria Ratings Points Selects an appropriate Concept Excellent Appropriately chooses one of the concepts listed. 5 pts Proficient Did not choose a concept from the list provided 0 pts Unsatisfactory 0 pts /5 pts Description of concept Excellent Clearly addresses the required elements (with minimal clarification needed) *Articulates the concept using a scenario, model case summary, or vignettes. *Provides a resume that speaks to the significance of the concept including content related to personal, professional OR health care delivery OR health policy. 20 pts Proficient Somewhat articulates the required elements, but moderate clarification is needed. 17 pts Unsatisfactory Fails to address the required elements. The required elements are addressed but lack development and clarification. One required element is clearly addressed. 14 pts /20 pts Analysis Excellent Clearly addresses the required elements with minimal clarification needed. *Identifies specific goals in working through the concept analysis and relates it to area of practice. *Addresses the underlying assumptions of this analysis. *Includes beliefs concerning the phenomenon. *What is accepted re: the concept as true/known and feelings about the concept* 20 pts Proficient Addresses 2 specific goals in working through the concept analysis and relates it to their area of practice. *Somewhat addresses the underlying assumptions of this analysis. *Somewhat includes beliefs concerning the phenomenon. 17 pts Unsatisfactory Addresses 1 specific goal. *Fails to clearly articulate specific goals in working through the concept analysis and relates it to their area of practice. *Fails to address the underlying assumptions of this analysis. *Fails to include beliefs concerning the phenomenon. 14 pts /20 pts Definition Excellent Addresses the required elements (with minimal clarification needed). *Clearly articulates two definitions of the concept. *Clearly compares (differences and similarities) of each definition. *Clearly describes/ defines related concepts in the literature. Minimal clarification needed, if any. 15 pts Proficient Somewhat articulates two definitions of the concept but needs further clarification. *Somewhat compares (differences and similarities) in each definition but needs further clarification. *Somewhat describes/ defines related concepts in the literature but needs further clarification. 13 pts Unsatisfactory Fails to clearly articulate two definitions. Fails to clearly compare (differences and similarities) the definitions. Fails to clearly describe/ define related concepts in the literature 10 pts /15 pts Case Description Excellent Clearly describes a case and provides a summary of it that exemplifies the defining criteria of the model or exemplar case. 10 pts Proficient Describes a case but does not provide a clear summary that exemplifies the defining criteria of the model or exemplar case. 8 pts Unsatisfactory Fails to clearly describe a case and provide a clear summary that exemplifies the defining criteria of the model or exemplar case. 6 pts /10 pts Defining Characteristics Excellent Clearly underlines or bolds the defining characteristics of the model case presented. 5 pts Proficient Does not underline or bold the defining characteristics of the presented model case. 0 pts Unsatisfactory 0 pts /5 pts Organization and APA formatting Excellent Logical flow maintained throughout the paper. 0-1 errors in APA formatting, including spacing, margins, headings, in-text citations, title/reference page, etc…. 10 pts Proficient Logical flow from beginning to end of paper is partially maintained. 2-4 errors in APA formatting, including spacing, margins, headings, in-text citations, title/reference page, etc…. 8 pts Unsatisfactory Structure of paper is difficult to follow. 5 or more errors in APA formatting, including spacing, margins, headings, in-text citations, title/reference page, etc… 6 pts /10 pts Mechanics Excellent Paper contains 0-1 errors in grammar, punctuation, capitalization and spelling errors. 10 pts Proficient Paper contains 2-4 grammatical, punctuation, capitalization and spelling errors. 8 pts Unsatisfactory Paper contains numerous (5 or more) grammatical, punctuation, capitalization and spelling errors. 6 pts /10 pts References Excellent Minimum of 3 references. All references are current (within the last 5 years) and originate from professional journals. References selected are research based. 5 pts Proficient Missing 1 required reference 4 pts Unsatisfactory Missing 2 required references 2 pts /5 pts Choose a submission type I agree to the tool's End-User License Agreement This assignment submission is my own, original work *